The evolution of art in the last years has been shaped by the rise of the museum, which has become a cultural and economic force. As an increasingly influential institution, museums have taken the role of cultural brokers and are an important source of revenue. In this age of mass media, museums have expanded their role as a means of entertainment and the development of tourism. But as a creative outlet, art has its limits.
The fundamental reasons for art-making have not changed. The structures that surround it have blown up like a speck of dust and will soon crumble in a cold breeze. In a globalized economy, the art world has become highly industrialized and has taken on bureaucratic proportions. It is also spreading like Godzilla into previously overlooked areas of the world. Nevertheless, there are many changes that continue to impact art.
One major change is the growth of commercialism. Several decades ago, the New York School had a strong internationalism, but that changed when cheap air travel made it more affordable. It became a place for emerging European artists to show their work in New York museums and galleries. This led to the development of a new kind of national internationalism. The Italians had Transavanguardia, which was a sort of avant-garde, while the Germans embraced neo-Expressionism.
The threat of corporate instrumentalization has resulted in the internalization of corporate methods, values and models. This has affected art schools, museums, galleries, and artists’ studios. These institutions rely on big-money backers for large-scale productions and have lost much of their autonomy and independence. This is a huge concern, but it is also an opportunity to make art more meaningful for society. The threat to commercialism has shifted the focus of contemporary culture away from the commercial sphere.
The evolution of art in the last years has changed radically. While the reasons for making art haven’t changed, the structures surrounding it have. The art world has become more bureaucratic and commercial, and its impact has multiplied. The global marketplace has created an ever more fragmented art scene, with little room for individual creativity. In the last few years, artists have been able to create new pieces without the help of the corporate machine.
Despite the increasing globalization of art, it has become a thriving industry. Globalization has transformed the world of art. There are no boundaries between artists and their work. For example, an artist can now sell his paintings for a fortune. And there is even more flexibility in the way that artists can promote their work. The evolution of the art industry continues to challenge the status of artists. This is a problem for the artist, but it’s also an opportunity for the public.
The ‘art world’ has become a business and a bureaucratic environment. Its exponents are still committed to making their work, but the ‘art industry’ has grown to industrial proportions. There is a growing market for artists, and this is affecting the evolution of art in the last years. If the art world isn’t thriving, the economy can’t survive without the artists. Despite these changes, the evolution of art has remained a vital medium for art. The creation of art is still a creative process. It is a global activity and, as such, it is imperative to recognize and embrace the impact of its actions on society.
The fundamental reasons for art haven’t changed. The structures surrounding it have, however, become increasingly bureaucratic. In fact, the ‘art world’ has blown up like dust, and the structures surrounding it are now a bureaucratic nightmare. Sadly, the ‘art world’ has not only become bureaucratic, it has reached a new, unwelcome level of corporatization.